For our last submission the decision took 25 days for which the editor apologized. At some point, they may come back to you and ask you to suggest names (additional names, if you had already given some when you originally submitted the paper). Journalists have embargoedaccess to papers via the Nature Research press site, and are permitted to show papers to independent specialists a few days in advance of publication, under embargo conditions, solely for the purpose of eliciting comment on the work described. My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. In a perfect world, we would consult with dozens of experts, who would spend many hours considering every point in the manuscript. Editors will not send resubmitted papers to the reviewers if it seems that the authors have not made a serious attempt to address all the referees criticisms. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? What the . My paper was published in a journal in 2021 october. It means the editor has actually received it and is reviewing. Nature is reluctant to consult new referees unless there is a particular, relevant area of scientific expertise that was lacking in the referees already used. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Not the answer you're looking for? Yet, little is known about how these infrastructures support, stabilize, transform or change existing editorial practices. Improve this answer. This referees opinion must be satisfied for the manuscript to be published, but as this referee may not know about the field concerned, an endorsement in isolation from the other referee(s) would not constitute grounds for publication. However, the final decision may not be only that of an acceptance or a rejection. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? The Decision Started status implies that peer review for your manuscript has been completed and the journals editorial board is in the process of making a decision. independence from the authors and their institutions, ability to evaluate the technical aspects of the paper fully and fairly, currently or recently assessing related submissions. round 1""nature nature metabolism. Your IP: :-). Yes What does the distribution of wait times for a editor decision look like for a manuscript submitted to Science or Nature? Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Journals vary in their attitude toward such trade-offs, for example in deciding whether to publish a paper that proposes an important new idea based on data that are less than solid. You said the finals started tomorrow. However, because the number of appeals has been growing to the point that it threatens to overwhelm our editorial resources, we have recently implemented a new system for considering them. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. We've added a "Necessary cookies only" option to the cookie consent popup. However, the Editor, in the rejection letter, provided an objective explanation for this long wait. Subscribe and get curated content that will give impetus to your research paper. And "wish you the best in your future endeavors" is the rejection letter equivalent of your crush signing "Have a great summer" in your yearbook. If the manuscript was transferred to us from another Nature Research journal, we will not publish reviewer reports or author rebuttals of versions of the manuscript considered by the originating Nature Research journal. youre still in the running. How to write an email to the editor inquiring about the current status of my paper? After a paper is accepted, it is subedited (copyedited) to ensure maximum clarity and reach, a process that enhances the value of papers in various ways. Although many decisions appear clear-cut, others are necessarily based on subtle distinctions between papers, and referees or editors can sometimes make mistakes. Research suggests that . It could mean just about anything. According to the process described in IEEE Transactions, Awaiting AE recommendation status means that the AE has collected all reviews from the reviewers who were assigned to review your manuscript and that the AEs decision for acceptance is pending. Under these circumstances, further experiments or technical work are usually required to address some or all of the referees concerns, and revised papers are sent back to some or all of the referees for a second opinion. A reject decision at this stage is final and cannot be reversed. Papers are evaluated along multiple dimensions, including technical reliability, novelty and interest, but the final decision to accept or reject must collapse all this information into a single binary choice. The paper is accepted for publication in principle once the authors have made some revisions in response to the referees comments. If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience . Rejection is of course a fact of life for all scientists, particularly when they submit their work to highly selective journals; in less than five years since its inception, Nature Neuroscience . In a competitive world, as Gore Vidal put it, It is not enough to succeed. Often, Editors reject the manuscript because the analytical approach is not sufficiently rigorous, explicit and argued, or because the results are barely significant or representative. Can I ask the editor to publish a withdrawn manuscript after acceptance? Decisions by editors are routinely made very rapidly after receipt of reports, and Nature offers an advance online publication (AOP) service to an increasing number of manuscripts. In [i] we find started associated with past time in [a] but with future time in [b], as indicated by the temporal modifiers yesterday and tomorrow respectively. The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). I have also worked as a subject matter expert in the field of Biomedicine. queensland figure skating. The above box-and-whisker plots show the days to decision for manuscripts submitted . 1124. We understand your anxiety :-) However, the. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); PIs gone AWOL? Stage 2: Editor assigned. PRX editors make every effort to arrive at a clear decision on the disposition of a manuscript within a reasonable time. I am at the same stage. edit: so no. Internet Explorer). The manuscript subject falls outside of the Aims and Scope of the selected journal or is not likely to be of interest to the readership of the selected journal. English Editing - Editage.com | Editage.jp | Editage.co.kr |SCI Editage.cn |publicao de artigos Editage.com.br | Editage.com.tw |Terms of UseforEnglish Editing Services. Click to reveal Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that . To subscribe to this RSS feed, copy and paste this URL into your RSS reader. ]]> If the editor is satisfied with your work, they will choose appropriate peer reviewers to evaluate your work, taking into account several factors including expertise, experience and apparent conflicts of interest. this is indeed the general case, also in my journal. //-->

Breaking News In Apple Valley, Most Wanted Realty Townsend, Mt, Kirkland Lens Cleaner Ingredients, Brainard Airport Hangars, Articles E